Welcome to the fourth in a 12 part series about how to improve your nature photography.

Step #4 – Lens do more then get you closer.

From super wide angles to extreme telephotos, lens are a big part of photography.  Every photographer experiences lens lust at some time; the idea that our photographs would be better if we only had a new lens.  Yet many photographers fail to use their lenses effectively.  Take your average photographic situation and think about which lens you would like to use.  Your answer probably depends on how close you are and how big you want the subject to be.  If you wish you were closer, you pull out the telephoto lens.  If you want to keep the subject small, you reach for the wide angle.

It is true that lenses will help get you closer, or move you back, but your feet can do that for free.  Understanding the impact different lenses have on the final image is an important step for the developing photographer.  50mm lenses are commonly referred to as “normal.”  The question is what does normal mean?  Photographically speaking, a normal lens is one that records the scene in a way that is similar to how the human eye sees it.  A similarity in angle of view and perspective is shared.  As we shift away from normal, our lenses began to deviate from reality in a number of ways.

Rock hoodoos in Bryce Canyon, Utah.

Telephoto lenses start at around 100mm and extend all the way out to 800mm.  Sure these lenses enlarge the subject, but they also manipulate the scene in two unique ways.

First, telephoto lenses have a drastically reduced angle of view.  Where a 50mm lens records 39 degrees, a 500mm lens records a mere 4 degrees.  The impact for photographers is twofold.  As we well know, the reduced angle of view gives the appearance that the subject is closer.  This limited angle of view has the added advantage of limiting how much of the background is included.  This gives the photographer much greater control over what is included in the background because moving a few inches can totally change an image’s background.

Second, telephoto lenses compress distance.  Subjects that are far away from each other appear closer together when viewed through a telephoto lens.  For example, the image above gives the appearance that the rock hoodoos of Bryce Canyon are stacked very close together.  This is an optical illusion as there is often between 30 – 50 feet separating the different hoodoos.  This compression effect gives photographers the ability to show or imply relationships between subjects that might not otherwise be obvious.

Telephoto lenses, with their narrow angle of view, are outstanding tools for visually isolating subjects and removing distractions.

Trail leading down into the hoodoos of Bryce Canyon, Utah.

Where telephoto lenses compress, wide angle lenses expand.  Starting at around 35mm, wide angle lenses are the go to tool for landscape photographers who wish to document the grand landscape.  As the name implies, wide angle lenses encompass an expanded angle of view when compared to longer lenses.  Angle of view can range from 54 degrees (35mm) to 108 degrees (13mm).  Yet including more means additional care must be taken when composing the scene if distractions are to be prevented.

At the same time, wide angles distort distance.  While telephoto lenses compress, wide angles exaggerate, giving the appearance of greater distances between subjects.  Again lets look at an example from Bryce Canyon.  The above image shows a trail wandering down into the hoodoos.  Looking at the hoodoos, it is clear that there is a fair amount of space between they.  Yet this is the same basic area that was photographed in the previous image.  By using a wide angle lens, a radically different perspective about how the hoodoos are spaced was created.

Wide angle lenses do not isolate elements the way telephoto lenses do.  Wide angles are more inclusive and should be used so as to take advantage of that inclusivity.  By placing key elements extremely close to the lens (a few inches), size and distance can be manipulated so as to emphasize particular parts of the scene.

Photographer standing on the edge of a river using a tripod, Utah.

Welcome to the third in a 12 part series about how to improve your nature photography.

Step #3 – Use a tripod.

I have heard all the reasons photographers give for not using a tripod.  It’s heavy.  It’s expensive.  I already have enough gear.  It doesn’t offer any benefits, so why bother?  No one says you have to use a tripod.  There aren’t any tripod police running around handing out tickets.  But I will let you in on a little secret.  The single fastest way to improve your photography is to use a tripod.

Tripods offer two distinct advantages over hand holding the camera.

Advantage #1 – Using a tripod results in sharper pictures.  I don’t care how stead your hands are, there are some shutter speeds you just can’t use if you are handholding your camera.  Years ago the advice was that you can successfully take sharp images down to a shutter speed equal to 1/the length of your lens.  If you were using a 50mm lens, you could hand hold down to 1/50 of a second.  A 200mm lens could only be hand held down to 1/200 of a second.  While image stabilizing (IS) technology has helped to push the barrier of what is hand holdable, there are limits.  Hand holding a camera for multi-second exposures will give you a blurry mess.  Not a problem if that is what you are going for, but my guess is that you will be disappointed with your results.

Nature photographers in particular face challenges that make using a tripod beneficial.  For wildlife, we use long telephoto lenses which enhance the slightest mistake.  The smallest movement with a 500m lens will exaggerate the movement 10x.  For landscapes, we strive for large depth of field, which requires tiny apertures.  Tiny apertures mean slow shutter speeds.  Hand holding under either of these conditions almost ensures soft images.  The last thing I want is to return home only to find that my award winning lion image is blurry.  Using a tripod will result in sharper images.

Advantage #2 – Using a tripod slows you down.  I admit it, tripods are a pain in the neck (actually the shoulders, but lets not get picky).  They are heavy and there will be times when you miss a shot because the tripod isn’t set up.  Still, I argue that the extra time it takes to set up a tripod is a good thing.  Knowing that taking a picture will require going through the process of setting up the tripod, we become much more selective in which pictures are worth the effort.  Using a tripod slows you down and makes you think.

This works for fast moving subjects too.  By setting the tripod up ahead of time (while you are still far away or before the action starts) you can be ready to capture images at a moments notice.  Also, when it is necessary to wait for an extended period to capture your image (a common situation in wildlife photography), a tripod supports the camera so that you don’t have to.  This makes the waiting easier and less physically demanding.

So stop thinking about the limitations and get a tripod.  It might be the single best step you could take to improve your photography.

The image above is John BlumenKamp when he was just getting started in nature photography (he has progressed a long way since then).  Looking at the image, it might be difficult to guess that it was taken at 1/3 of a second with a 100mm lens.  John and the rocks are both sharp, yet the water and John’s hand are blurred (he moved as I pressed the shutter).  By using a tripod I was able to remove camera shake from the equation and get the picture I wanted.  The image was captured using a Canon 1Ds, 70-200mm lens (set to 100mm), at 50 ISO.  The camera and lens were mounted on a Gitzo tripod.

Welcome to the second in a 12 part series about how to improve your nature photography.

Step #2 – It is about light.

Take a look at the picture below.  This is a shot of Uluru (more commonly called Ayers rock), the world famous red rock of central Australia.  The rock is famous for its beauty and is a sacred site to the local aborigines.  Yet you would never know it by looking at this picture.  The light is flat and dull, resulting in a picture that is equally dull to look at.

Uluru (AKA Ayer's Rock) photographed with poor light, Australia.

Now, take a look at the same picture, with different light.  This shot was captured moments after the sunrise broke the horizon.  For that brief moment in time, the rock literally glowed (no, the image was not enhanced in Photoshop).  The difference between the two images is striking.  The first image is hardly worth looking at while the second shows a natural spectacle that I travelled over 10,000 miles to witness.  Yet the only difference between the two images is the light.

Uluru (AKA Ayer's Rock) photographed with beautiful light, Australia.

Photography is about light.  Its angle, color, and intensity all impact the final image.  As we become more involved in photography, we begin to watch the light and see how it changes the subject.  Understanding how light is recorded by the camera and how it changes the appearance of the subject is one of the keys to improving your images.  In the studio, photographers have the ability to manipulate light in many different ways.  They can add it or remove it.  As nature photographers, we are not so fortunate.  We are at nature’s mercy as to what type of light we are going to get.  Sure, we try to stack the deck in our favor by getting up before the dawn and being prepared to take advantage of the golden light of sunrise, but it doesn’t always work out the way we wish.  I remember one getting up one morning hoping for a sunrise and getting a snowstorm instead.  The lack of control is one of nature photography’s greatest challenges.  It is also one of its most interesting elements.  Each time I grab my camera, I don’t know what opportunity I am going to get.  It takes patience and persistence to capture the right light.  You have to keep going back to the same locations again and again in the hope that something magical will happen.

 

Large flock of snow geese taking off in front of the rising sun, Bosque del Apache national wildlife refuge, New Mexico.

Welcome to the first in a 12 part series about how to improve your nature photography.

Step #1 – Know your equipment.

Modern cameras are amazing.  They take the guess work out of photography.  It is possible to put everything into auto mode and shoot away.  Truth be told, that will even work 90% of the time.  But why would you want to?  If you want to point and shoot, don’t buy a DSLR.  Buy a point and shoot camera and save thousands of dollars.  DSLRs provide the photographer with numerous options.  That is why they cost so much.  Failing to use those functions is similar to purchasing a race car and using it to carpool kids to dance class.  It works, but why do it?

Light meters, autofocus, and other technological innovations have come a long way, but they are not perfect.  In their attempt to automate the photographic process, manufacturers have made assumptions about your photographs.  They assume you want an average depth of field.  They assume your subjects are either still or moving in a predictable manner.  They assume the world you are viewing is not too bright or too dark.  Again, this works in most situations.

The problem is the other 10%.  Those times when situations are most dramatic and the resulting images are the most unique (can something be most unique?  Sorry, side thought).  These are the times when your camera gets it wrong.  Unfortunately, these are also the situations that create the strongest images.

As photographers, our goal is to capture images that share a message in an effective manner.  To accomplish this, it is essential that we understand what our equipment does.  If you don’t know what choices the automatic settings are making for you, or when to override those choices, your images will look like everyone else’s.  They wont stand out and be noticed.  The world is full of good images.  If you want to be noticed, your images have to be better then good.  If you want your images to stand out, you have to be able to answer some questions.

  • What are my camera settings and why should I care?
  • What is exposure?
  • When is aperture priority better then manual?
  • How do aperture and shutter speed change the image?
  • Why does the camera have dozens of different custom functions and which should I use?

All of these are important questions and your ability to answer them will impact the options available to you in the field.

The idea of sitting down and actually reading the camera manual sends chills up most people’s spines.  Yet it is one of the best things you can do as a photographer.  Find out what the different controls do.  Decide how those controls impact your photography.  Then decide which of those controls you will actually want to use for different aspects of your photography.  Once you understand what you camera is capable of doing, you can make your choice: let the camera make the decisions for you or override the camera and make your own choices.  Both options have a place, but only by understanding your equipment is it possible to consistently get the images you want.

The image above documents one of those magical moments in nature photography.  Each year, thousands of snow geese winter at Bosque del apache national wildlife refuge in New Mexico.  As a result it is a mecca for bird photographers.  Each morning photographers brave the frigid temperatures in the hope of experiencing a blast off in which thousands of geese take to the air as a single flock.  The sound of a blast off is like thunder.  This particular image was made possible because I knew how my camera’s light meter would interpret having the sun directly behind the birds.  The image was created using a Canon 1Ds, 600mm lens with a 1.4 teleconverter, at 200 ISO.  The camera and lens were mounted on a Gitzo tripod and a Wimberly tripod head.

 

 

Lioness hiding in the grass, Ngorongoro Crater, Tanzania.

I hope you have interests outside of photography.  Photography is an amazing opportunity to share your vision with the world and provides countless hours of pleasure.  Yet failing to balance your interest in photography with other pass times can lead to burnout.  Ironically, spending time doing other things can actually improve your photography.  I find that the more time I spend involved in an activity, the more I find connections between my different interests.  These connections can then be used so that time spent involved in one activity can directly benefit the other activities.  Let me give you an example.

In July, 2009 I made a realization.  I was in Africa and getting ready to leave the Kigongoni lodge in Tanzania.  I grabbed my assorted bags and started heading up the hill to the lobby.  The sad truth is that I had to take several break on the way.  Yes, my bags were heavy (cameras and gear for three weeks on safari) and yes the hill was steep.  Still, those breaks acted as a wakeup call.  My father passed away when he was 55 and my grandfather did too.  Both were out of shape and had a variety of health problems.  I want to be there to see my kid when they grow up.  I needed to get in shape.

When I returned home I started swimming for exercise.  My first workout involved a swim of 150m.  This is accomplished by swimming across the pool 6 times.  At the end I though I was going to throw up, but I stuck with it.  At the end of three weeks I was able to swim for almost a mile (72 laps).  In December of that year I decided to take my workouts to the next level and enter a triathlon.  Today I have completed four triathlons and look forward to many more in the future.

The questions you are probably asking is, “What does this have to do with photography?”  Nothing!  It’s my blog and I can talk about anything I want.  Just kidding.  There actually is a connection.  One of my initial concerns when I started exercising was that I didn’t have enough time.  I can now say that excuse is BS.  I have been able to accomplish more in the last year and a half then I have during almost any other period of my life and I have been exercising between 7-10 hours every week.  In fact, training for triathlons has provided several lessons that apply equally well to photography.

  • Improvement takes time.  People who are new to exercise often want a quick fix.  They want to run without gasping for breath, swim without pause, and bike without having small children pass them (it has happened to me).  All of these things are possible with time, but there are no shortcuts.  The same is true with photography.  Many beginners come to photography with the goal of being masters.  The problem is that they expect to be handed that title after a few days.  Photography is a art and a craft and it takes time to master the foundation out of which mastery is obtained.
  • The key is consistency.  Fitness is not the result of a single, long exercise session.  It is the accumulation of small gains over time.  New photographers are often told to shoot more.  It is not enough to go out and shoot once or twice a month.  If you want to get better, you need to capture thousands of images, evaluate them, then go out and capture thousands more.  Only through constant practice will we improve our skills.
  • You have to get your hands dirty.  I am someone who likes to read.  When I get interested in a subject, I start looking for books and internet sites.  But reading is not enough.  Reading about triathlons is not a replacement for training and doing one.  Similarly, reading about photographic techniques is a great supplement, but not a replacement for taking pictures.  Understanding photography on an intellectual level is not the same as the innate understanding of the process that can only be gained by using a camera.  You must be able to apply your knowledge or it is worthless.

Whatever activities interest you, take a step back and look at how it connects with your photography.  It might provide you with some new ideas for the next time you take your camera out in the field.

Written on April 14th, 2011 , Photography Information

Sandhill Crane flying against a deep blue sky, Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico.

I hate getting up early.  Staying up late, no problem.  Heck, I studied owls in graduate school for a reason.  My work day started at 10 pm and I never had to work mornings!  Yet sunrise is one of the best times to photograph wildlife.  Oftentimes sacrifices must be made to photograph the subjects we love.  Not only is wildlife more active in the early morning hours, but the light is beautiful.  Photographers go so far as to call the hour after sunrise “magic hour” due to the light’s low angle and warm colors.  If you want your images to look like the pros, you need to greet the dawn with a camera in your hand.  It is not easy (I have learned to place my alarm on the other side of the room if I want to win my battle with the snooze button), but if you want to be a wildlife photographer, you need to do it.

The image of the sandhill crane was taken shortly after sunrise at Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge, south of Albuquerque, New Mexico.  The image was captured using a Canon 10D, 300mm IS lens, at 100 ISO.  The camera was handheld.

Written on April 6th, 2011 , Photography Information

African elephant photographed at pre-dawn with an ISO setting of 12800, Tarangire National Park, Tanzania.

I admit it.  I am an ISO snob.  Most nature photographers are, especially if they started with film.  19 years ago I got my start in wildlife photography with a Nikon camera and a few rolls of film.  As an aspiring nature photographer, I read everything I could find on the subject and one piece of advice stood out above all others.  Real nature photographers use low ISO film.  Of course, I wanted to be a real nature photographer (even if my pictures were mostly blurry black blobs, it was the thought that counts), so I used low ISO film.  This was a time when Fuji Velvia had just hit the market and at 50 ISO, Velvia certainly qualified as slow speed film.  After a few years, I switch to Kodak 100VS, another saturated film that provided the lightning speed of 100 ISO.  For years I was happy shooting at 100 ISO.  On rare occasions I pushed the film to 200 ISO.  I even admit to once pushing it to 400 ISO, but I was dehydrated that day and not responsible for my actions.  The idea of using high ISO settings went against my very core as a nature photographer.  I either got a noise free image, or I didn’t get the shot.  It was that simple.

Then things began to change.  In 2003 I purchased my first digital camera.  No, I didn’t rush out and immediately start using high ISOs, though I think I might have accidentally taken a picture at 800 ISO once.  The shift was gradual.  With film my default ISO setting was 50 or 100, so that is where I started with digital.  After a year or two, I learned that most digital cameras are optimized for 200 ISO, which contains less noise then the lower settings.  OK, no more low ISO settings.  From then on I started shooting fast on a regular basis.  Like 200 ISO fast.

The erosion of my photographic principles continued over the next few years as newer and better cameras were created.  Noise reduction was one of the key advantages of these new cameras, but it just felt wrong to use those settings.  Then it happened.  I purchased a Canon 1D mark 4.  This camera was making headlines in the photographic world for the low noise at high ISO setting and the temptation was almost too much to ignore.  One morning on safari in Tarangire National Park, I decided to push the camera and see what I could do.  The morning was heavily overcast and dark.  When we came across a small herd of elephants, I decided to put the camera to the test.  The light was so low I could hardly even see the elephants, much less photograph them.  With nothing to loose, I changes the ISO setting to a heart stopping 12,800 and began to take pictures.  Fortunately the camera did not explode in my hands.  Above is one of the resulting images.  I don’t know about you, but I’m impressed.  Does the image contain noise?  Of course it does.  Is the noise a distraction?  Not even close.  Not only is this an acceptable photograph, but shooting with such a high ISO opens a world of opportunities that were not previously possible.

As photographers we often fall into the trap of doing the same thing we have always done.  Taking risks is how we get better.  It is how we push the boundaries of our craft and create new photographic opportunities.  It took me 18 years to explore the limits of high ISO.  Don’t wait that long.  Find your limits and take a step past them.  You might like the results.

Written on March 31st, 2011 , Africa, Photography Information, Tanzania

Light is not constant.  Not only does the quality of light and the angle of light change, but so does its color.  As the day progresses, the predominant color of light shifts.  In the early hours of pre-dawn, the world is covered in a veil of blue.  Photographing before the sun breaks the horizon produces a blue tint in our images.  As the day progresses, the light shifts.  Once the sun breaks the horizon, the world is flooded with the golden colors of sunrise.  This light provides a warmth that is radically different then the coolness of pre-dawn.  As the sun moves across the sky, the light looses its golden hue and becomes the “white” light we associate with daylight.  Once the sun reaches it zenith, the process reverses itself.

Candle on a table at twilight, Tarangire National Park, Tanzania.

 

Northern Gannett flying over the ocean at twilight, NewFoundland, Canada.

 

Female lion (lioness) portrait at sunset in Tarangire National Park, Tanzania.

 

Landrover stopped on road watching a herd of wildebeest blocking the road, Serengeti National Park, Tanzania.

As photographers, we can use these color shifts in a number of ways.

  • One fundamental use of color is how it alters the appearance of a subject.  If we photograph the same subject under different light we will get different results.  A lion’s fur does not look the same during sunrise as it does at noon.  By returning to photograph the same subjects under different lighting conditions, it becomes possible to create radically different images.  Try returning to the same subjects and photographic them in every possible lighting condition.
  • Color has a powerful impact on our moods, which in turn impacts how we interpret images.  Blue provides a sense of calmness.  Red has energy and is associated with violence.  Green is the color of nature and contains a sense of vibrancy.  Deliberately including specific colors in an image gives you an opportunity to push the viewer’s emotions in a specific direction.
  • People tend to find some colors more pleasing then others.  The golden rays of sunrise and sunset produce some of the strongest images, in part because most people prefer warm tones over cooler tones.
  • While colors can be used to compliment the subject, don’t ignore their ability to clash with a viewer’s expectations.  Depicting a clearcut forest in the golden rays of sunset would be one example of how the beauty of color could be used to contrast against the rawness of the situation in such a way as to make the viewer do a double take.

Color is a powerful creative tool and we often overlook it in our daily lives.  As photographers, we spend a great deal of time looking at the world around us, and it is important that we take the time to consider how the color of light impacts that scene.

Sunrise at Enchanted Rock State Park, Texas.

I am finishing up my sixth year back in Texas and I am sorry to say that I have spent a good portion of that time lamenting what I gave up when we left Utah.  Utah is a beautiful state and within 30 minutes of my doorstep I had access to an unending supply of public land to explore.  The elk rut in Yellowstone National Park was only five hours away and the red rocks of southern Utah were only four.  The move back to Texas came as a photographic culture shock.  Over 98% of the land in Texas is privately owned and gaining access is often difficult.  The Valley Land Fund and other conservation organizations have made progress in openning up some of the private ranches for photography, but it really is a different world for the nature photographer.

Yet the recent NANPA summit, coupled with a weekend camping trip with my family (it was Tristan’s first time sleeping in a tent) reminded me of the things I like about Texas.  The wildlife is extremely diverse and we have some of the most beautiful, rugged landscapes in the world.  Not to mention that I have never had to shovel snow since moving to San Antonio.  The lesson is that we can spend so much time thinking that the grass is greener on the other side of the fence that we forget to see the beauty in our own backyard.  Now, get out and shoot.

The image above was captured at sunrise in Enchanted Rock State Park which is located in the Texas Hill Country.  The image was captured using a Canon 1Ds mark 3, 17-35mm lens (set to 17mm), at 200 ISO.  The camera was mounted on a tripod to provide stability in the early morning light.

 

Written on March 25th, 2011 , Photography Information

Zebra heard running through the water cropped as a panoramic, Serengeti National Park, Tanzania.

I don’t crop my images very often.  I started photography back in the days of film and I always shot slide film.  When processed, slides came back outlines in little cardboard frames ready to be shared with the world, no printing necessary.  There was something fundamentally appealing about getting the perfect picture in camera and displaying it the way you shot it.  With a slide, what you shot is what you got.  So, for almost 12 years I got what I shot (sounds like a Dr. Seuss rhyme).  On the positive side, I became very good at fine tuning the image before pressing the shutter.  On the negative side, cropping images is something I still hesitate to do, even though it often improves the image.  Eight years after moving to digital and I still find it difficult to break the habit.

Digital has made photography easier in some many ways, not the least of which is the ease with which we can crop images.  Is there a distraction along the upper edge of the frame?  Crop it.  Want your image to be a square?  Crop it.  Like the panoramic look?  Crop it.  Where is it written that photographs have to maintain their aspect ratio in which they were shot?  Yet photographers, especially those who got their start with slide film, often forget that cropping is a tool and if it helps to improve the image, we should use it.

The image of the zebra herd running through the water was captured in the Serengeti in Tanzania.  The image was captured using a Canon 1Ds mark 3, 120-300mm sigma lens (at 176mm), at 400 ISO.  The image was taken from a vehicle using a beanbag for support.

Written on March 3rd, 2011 , Composition, Photography Information

Through the lens with Chris Gamel is proudly powered by WordPress and the Theme Adventure by Eric Schwarz
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

Through the lens with Chris Gamel

Musings of a photographic educator.