Welcome to the third in a 12 part series about how to improve your nature photography.
Step #3 – Use a tripod.
I have heard all the reasons photographers give for not using a tripod. It’s heavy. It’s expensive. I already have enough gear. It doesn’t offer any benefits, so why bother? No one says you have to use a tripod. There aren’t any tripod police running around handing out tickets. But I will let you in on a little secret. The single fastest way to improve your photography is to use a tripod.
Tripods offer two distinct advantages over hand holding the camera.
Advantage #1 – Using a tripod results in sharper pictures. I don’t care how stead your hands are, there are some shutter speeds you just can’t use if you are handholding your camera. Years ago the advice was that you can successfully take sharp images down to a shutter speed equal to 1/the length of your lens. If you were using a 50mm lens, you could hand hold down to 1/50 of a second. A 200mm lens could only be hand held down to 1/200 of a second. While image stabilizing (IS) technology has helped to push the barrier of what is hand holdable, there are limits. Hand holding a camera for multi-second exposures will give you a blurry mess. Not a problem if that is what you are going for, but my guess is that you will be disappointed with your results.
Nature photographers in particular face challenges that make using a tripod beneficial. For wildlife, we use long telephoto lenses which enhance the slightest mistake. The smallest movement with a 500m lens will exaggerate the movement 10x. For landscapes, we strive for large depth of field, which requires tiny apertures. Tiny apertures mean slow shutter speeds. Hand holding under either of these conditions almost ensures soft images. The last thing I want is to return home only to find that my award winning lion image is blurry. Using a tripod will result in sharper images.
Advantage #2 – Using a tripod slows you down. I admit it, tripods are a pain in the neck (actually the shoulders, but lets not get picky). They are heavy and there will be times when you miss a shot because the tripod isn’t set up. Still, I argue that the extra time it takes to set up a tripod is a good thing. Knowing that taking a picture will require going through the process of setting up the tripod, we become much more selective in which pictures are worth the effort. Using a tripod slows you down and makes you think.
This works for fast moving subjects too. By setting the tripod up ahead of time (while you are still far away or before the action starts) you can be ready to capture images at a moments notice. Also, when it is necessary to wait for an extended period to capture your image (a common situation in wildlife photography), a tripod supports the camera so that you don’t have to. This makes the waiting easier and less physically demanding.
So stop thinking about the limitations and get a tripod. It might be the single best step you could take to improve your photography.
The image above is John BlumenKamp when he was just getting started in nature photography (he has progressed a long way since then). Looking at the image, it might be difficult to guess that it was taken at 1/3 of a second with a 100mm lens. John and the rocks are both sharp, yet the water and John’s hand are blurred (he moved as I pressed the shutter). By using a tripod I was able to remove camera shake from the equation and get the picture I wanted. The image was captured using a Canon 1Ds, 70-200mm lens (set to 100mm), at 50 ISO. The camera and lens were mounted on a Gitzo tripod.



